Using Argument Diagramming to Improve Peer Grading of Writing Assignments
نویسندگان
چکیده
One of the major components of MOOCs is the weekly assignment. Most of the assignments are multiple choice, short answer or programming assignments and can be graded automatically by the system. Since assignments that include argumentation or scientific writing are difficult to grade automatically, MOOCs often use a crowd-sourced evaluation of the writing assignments in the form of peer grading. Studies show that this peer-grading scheme faces some reliability issues due to widespread variation in the course participants’ motivation and preparation. In this paper we present a process of computer-supported argumentation diagramming and essay writing that facilitates the peer grading of the writing assignments. The process has not been implemented in a MOOC context but all the supporting tools are web-based and can be easily applied to MOOC settings.
منابع مشابه
THE IMPACT OF USING COMPUTER-AIDED ARGUMENT MAPPING (CAAM) ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS’ WRITING SELF-REGULATION
The present study was conducted to investigate the impact of using computer-aided argument mapping (CAAM) on the improvement of Iranian learners’ writing self-regulation. To this end, 90 participants out of 127 senior university students in English translation were selected after administrating language proficiency test, as well as an essay writing test for the purpose of homogenizing the learn...
متن کاملA Global Perspective on Argument Diagramming to Support Writing Skills
Can online argument diagramming help students learn written argumentation skills? Students at Moi University Law School in Erldoret, Kenya, received free tablet computers through the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. Researchers at the Learning Research and Development Center created a learning module to teach legal argumentation skills to over 400 Moi students in three sections of a law ...
متن کاملWriting Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course
Writing assignments, including note taking and written recall, should enhance retention of knowledge, whereas analytical writing tasks with metacognitive aspects should enhance higher-order thinking. In this study, we assessed how certain writing-intensive "interventions," such as written exam corrections and peer-reviewed writing assignments using Calibrated Peer Review and including a metacog...
متن کاملExperimental evidence for diagramming benefits in science writing
Arguing for the need for a scientific research study (i.e. writing an introduction to a research paper) poses significant challenges for students. When faced with these challenges, students often generate overly safe replications (i.e. fail to find and include opposition to their hypothesis) or in contrast include no strong support for their hypothesis (i.e. relevant, valid evidence). How can w...
متن کاملStudents’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work
We investigate students’ negative perceptions about an online peer assessment system for undergraduate writing across the disciplines. Specifically, we consider the nature of students’ resistance to peer assessment; what factors influence that resistance; and how students’ perceptions impact their revision work. We do this work by first examining findings from an end-of-course survey administer...
متن کامل